{"id":371384,"date":"2023-06-15T16:55:32","date_gmt":"2023-06-15T14:55:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/?p=371384"},"modified":"2023-06-15T16:55:32","modified_gmt":"2023-06-15T14:55:32","slug":"muk-nije-trebalo-odbaciti-predlog-za-razrjesenje-medenice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/2023\/06\/15\/muk-nije-trebalo-odbaciti-predlog-za-razrjesenje-medenice\/","title":{"rendered":"Muk: Nije trebalo odbaciti predlog za razrje\u0161enje Medenice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u010clan Tu\u017eila\u010dkog savjeta Stevo Muk kazao je, nakon zatvorene sjednice tog tijela, da zbog formalno-pravnih razloga nije trebalo odbaciti predlog disciplinske tu\u017eiteljke za razrje\u0161enje rukovoditeljke Vi\u0161eg dr\u017eavnog tu\u017eila\u0161tva Lepe Medenice.<\/p>\n<p>Muk i predstavnik Ministarstva pravde Bojan Bo\u017eovi\u0107 bili su protiv toga da Tu\u017eila\u010dki savjet odbije predlog za razrje\u0161enje, ali je ve\u0107inom glasova usvojena takva odluka, prenose Vijesti.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Mislim da ta odluka koja je danas donijeta nije dobra, da smo kao Tu\u017eila\u010dki savjet morali da omogu\u0107imo da se ovaj postupak nastavi. Odluka je donijeta iz prete\u017eno formalno-pravnih razloga za koje jeste odgovorna zamjenica disciplinskog tu\u017eioca, koja je sastavila optu\u017eni predlog koji nije kvalitetan, ali da smo uprkos tome morali na\u0107i na\u010din da se ovaj proces odblokira&#8221;, kazao je Muk novinarima nakon sjednice.<\/p>\n<p>Muk je jedini bio protiv da se sjednica Tu\u017eila\u010dkog savjeta zatvori za javnost.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lk7F6cgJSr\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/2023\/06\/15\/tuzilacki-savjet-odbio-predlog-za-razrjesenje-lepe-medenice\/\">Tu\u017eila\u010dki savjet odbio predlog za razrje\u0161enje Lepe Medenice<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Tu\u017eila\u010dki savjet odbio predlog za razrje\u0161enje Lepe Medenice&#8221; &#8212; PCNEN\" src=\"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/2023\/06\/15\/tuzilacki-savjet-odbio-predlog-za-razrjesenje-lepe-medenice\/embed\/#?secret=HMK1Rhi6s7#?secret=lk7F6cgJSr\" data-secret=\"lk7F6cgJSr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u010clan Tu\u017eila\u010dkog savjeta Stevo Muk kazao je, nakon zatvorene sjednice tog tijela, da zbog formalno-pravnih razloga nije trebalo odbaciti predlog disciplinske tu\u017eiteljke za razrje\u0161enje rukovoditeljke Vi\u0161eg dr\u017eavnog tu\u017eila\u0161tva Lepe Medenice. Muk i predstavnik Ministarstva pravde Bojan Bo\u017eovi\u0107 bili su protiv toga da Tu\u017eila\u010dki savjet odbije predlog za razrje\u0161enje, ali je ve\u0107inom glasova usvojena takva odluka, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-371384","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vijesti"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371384","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371384"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371384\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":371385,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371384\/revisions\/371385"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371384"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371384"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371384"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}