{"id":317834,"date":"2021-04-09T17:08:41","date_gmt":"2021-04-09T15:08:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/?p=317834"},"modified":"2021-04-09T17:08:41","modified_gmt":"2021-04-09T15:08:41","slug":"afera-koverta-ponovo-na-sudu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/2021\/04\/09\/afera-koverta-ponovo-na-sudu\/","title":{"rendered":"Afera Koverta ponovo na sudu"},"content":{"rendered":"

Apelacioni sud Crne Gore je uva\u017eio \u017ealbu Specijalnog dr\u017eavnog tu\u017eila\u0161tva i ukinuo je rje\u0161enje Vi\u0161eg suda kojim je obustavljen postupak protiv Slavoljuba Stijepovi\u0107a zboh afere “Koverta”.<\/p>\n

Vije\u0107e Vi\u0161eg suda u Podgorici je 2. marta obustavilo krivi\u010dni postupak<\/a> protiv biv\u0161eg gradona\u010delnika Podgorice Slavoljuba Stijepovi\u0107a, koji je u aferi “Koverta”<\/a> optu\u017een za pranje novca.<\/p>\n

Odlukom Apelacionog suda, predmet je vra\u0107en prvostepenom sudu na ponovno odlu\u010divanje.<\/p>\n

“Vije\u0107e je ukinulo prvostepeno rje\u0161enje u navedenom dijelu, jer su u postupku dono\u0161enja rje\u0161enja u\u010dinjene povrede odredaba krivi\u010dnog postupka iz \u010dlana 386 st.1 ta\u010d.9 ZKP-a, obzirom da su razlozi o odlu\u010dnim \u010dinjenicama nejasni i protivrje\u010dni, zbog \u010dega se nije mogla ispitati pravilnost i zakonitost pobijanog rje\u0161enja. Na ove povrede osnovano je ukazano u \u017ealbi Specijalnog dr\u017eavnog tu\u017eioca i na iste drugostepeni sud pazi po slu\u017ebenoj du\u017enosti, u smislu \u010dlana 417 st.4, u vezi \u010dlana 386 st.1 ZKP-a. Osim toga, osnovano je u \u017ealbi navodeno i da je zaklju\u010divanje u pobijanom rje\u0161enju da nema dovoljno dokaza da je okrivljeni S.S. osnovano sumnjiv za djelo koje je predmet optu\u017ebe pogre\u0161no, u vezi sa \u010dime je izostala ocjena datih dokaza, pa je \u010dinjeni\u010dno stanje pogre\u0161no utvr\u0111eno”, pi\u0161e u obrazlo\u017eenju odluke.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Odlukom Apelacionog suda, predmet je vra\u0107en prvostepenom sudu na ponovno odlu\u010divanje<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"","_seopress_robots_index":"","_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-317834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vijesti"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317834"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317834\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":317835,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317834\/revisions\/317835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.pcnen.com\/portal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}